Understanding the PCAOB and AICPA audits differences
The PCAOB and AICPA audits are two important types of audits used in Malaysia to ensure the accuracy and compliance of public company financial statements. While both audits are designed to provide assurance on financial statements, they have different regulatory frameworks and standards. The PCAOB audit is required for companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges, while the AICPA audit is more commonly used for private companies.
Additionally, the PCAOB audit focuses on specific areas such as internal controls, while the AICPA audit provides a more general assessment of the financial statements.
ℹ️ Understanding the differences between these two audits can help companies and investors make more informed decisions about which type of audit may be best suited for their needs. You also need to make sure that your company follow the Business Compliance.
Differences between PCAOB and AICPA auditing standards and practices
The PCAOB and AICPA audits differ in terms of their auditing standards and practices.
➤ The PCAOB sets its own auditing standards, which are separate from the generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) used by the AICPA. The PCAOB standards are more prescriptive and require auditors to follow a specific methodology, including testing of internal controls over financial reporting. |
➤ On the other hand, AICPA standards are more principles-based and provide auditors with more flexibility in how they approach an audit engagement. In terms of audit reporting, the PCAOB requires auditors to issue a separate report on internal controls, while the AICPA includes information on internal controls in the audit opinion. |